MedocMad wrote:
Talking of CB I still have some 93/94/95 in the cellar.
Anyone sampled these vintages recently ?? should really drink the 93 this year though.
Got wine friends booked in at the end of Nov so might open then with a Leoville Barton 81 to follow. Now that is a outstanding wine !!
Richard,
I don't think I can get my head around someone who had left Cloudy Bay Sauvignon blanc in the cellar since 1993. 16 years for a straight SB. In Pessac, a large amount of semillon is added to SB in order for it to be capable of evolving, and the fresh oak provides a structure to support the fruit, and even then..........16 years. The mind boggles
.
I'd be amazed if that SB was not now like gently composted hay, with a distinct fino sherry nose, but none of the fino flavour
.
Cloudy Bay Chardonnay 1993 may be fairing a tiny bit better though. It was a small harvest so it may have been firm and concentrated enough. But even then, I would have drunk it by the Millenium at the very latest. I don't know ! Was there any oak in the Cloudy Bay chardonnay, if it is the chardonnay we are talking about ?
Surely Richard, this must be a typo - Do you mean 2003/4/5 ?
Leoville Barton is Saint Julien if my memory serves me well. a 3rd Cru classe is it ? I have drunk lesser years when they were bargains. I remember when I was in the money that the Barton's can remain asleep for ages, and you have to catch them right, I particular remember one that was so asleep that it was only ciggar box and pencil shavings - but that was my fault, I was trying to impress a host, I think it was an 87, and drunk at 11 years.
The 82's were spectacular, and we lushed out with much cheaper left bank on my 45th & 50'th, but 81's are they holding ? My memory says it was not a laying down vintage per se' (even for the top cru's) and I can't say I bought a lot of 81's even when I was in the money, because the petite chateau's weren't that great.
If you have many left, I'd enjoy before they go over.
That my two cents...