Goosegogs wrote:
After a very poor run, the Loire has defeated me. I will stick to the top wines and pay the extra as and when I feel a need.
You have been punished by those indifferent '11s - If you are paying the extra for the top doggies, stick with the 2010's otherwise - you may be upsetting the budget for nothing "for the sake of need" - I fear.
Talking disappointment
![Mad :x](./images/smilies/icon_mad.gif)
I'd been sat on this a while...........
I opened a bottle of 1998 cahors last night, the Clos de Gamot- only had the one. A reputed walled cahors property - they say ! This is an historic estate, tucked into a bend on the River Lot in the village of Prayssac, making very traditional unembellished Auxerrois - (French ancient vine 'Roman' malbec)
I think I'm done with any more cahors - disappointingly black for the 'sake' of it ! A blank black board, a null. Was hoping for hot stones, garrique scrub and wild herbs, annis, vanilla and dark damson plum. It was very hollow, a dank pool, and weedy in the mouth.
The 1990 sells for up to 40 euro in Ireland ?? Bah ! But in the States, these wines appeared to be significantly cheaper.
I don't understand these Auxerrois wines.