Quaffers' Offers
https://quaffersoffers.co.uk/QOforum/

N (very) WR
https://quaffersoffers.co.uk/QOforum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7022		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Bacchus [ Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:17 pm ]
Post subject:  N (very) WR
My Google search page has suddenly introduced a black task / tool bar. Can't get rid of it, and it's really horrid. Anyone else please?
Author:  Shezza [ Fri Jul 01, 2011 6:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: N (very) WR
Have had it for about a week myself
I don't stay on it long enough for it to have really bothered me yet
Will have a look tho if it can be change as do agree it is ugly
Author:  GK [ Fri Jul 01, 2011 8:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: N (very) WR
I think it has something to do with Googles plan to take on Facebook.

Get used to it.
Author:  Duncan [ Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: N (very) WR
Bacchus wrote:
Anyone else please?


They always f*ck about re-inventing the wheel.
Author:  Bacchus [ Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: N (very) WR
Ha! it's gone...but now ther's an even worse side bar... :x
Author:  GK [ Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:40 am ]
Post subject:  Re: N (very) WR
Mine is still there.

Sweet Jesus, have a look at this place.

This is Richards home btw (MM), the cellar is accessed via the dungeon.
Author:  tribs [ Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: N (very) WR
Nice one, GK. I showed that to Mrs T, telling her I've found her dream house. She was horrified.

Ba, I'll see your new Google homepage and raise you the new BBC homepage. It's truly dreadful.
Author:  Bacchus [ Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: N (very) WR
I really thought that the house was a model, and was awaiting the final pic which would be a long-shot showing it to be a few feet square...Ba!
Author:  GK [ Thu Dec 01, 2011 1:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: N (very) WR
I close my eyes but I still see the paterns.....

I think Clarkson has overstepped the line with this.

As much as I like the guy and dislike the PC brigade, he went too far this time. I hope they throw the book at him.
Author:  tribs [ Thu Dec 01, 2011 1:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: N (very) WR
GK wrote:
I close my eyes but I still see the paterns.....

I think Clarkson has overstepped the line with this.

As much as I like the guy and dislike the PC brigade, he went too far this time. I hope they throw the book at him.


Nah, it was clearly a joke. Nothing wrong with it in my eyes. I think it's pretty funny actually.

Quote:
“I’d have them all shot. I would take them outside and execute them in front of their families,”

“I mean how dare they go on strike when they have these gilt-edged pensions that are going to be guaranteed, while the rest of us have to work for a living.”


For Unison to take legal action would be ridiculous.
Author:  GK [ Thu Dec 01, 2011 1:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: N (very) WR
Obviously a joke to him, but a crap one nonetheless. Cheap and unimaginative with a wink to the Daily Mail readers.

Perhaps legal action is a step too far but he should be made to apologise and look the arse he has made himself out to be on this occasion.
Author:  Bacchus [ Thu Dec 01, 2011 4:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: N (very) WR
Voltaire would turn in his grave...and my dear old dad would like to have shot several others than just strikers.

I know...let's put Clarkson in Guantanamo.


Image
Author:  Duncan [ Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: N (very) WR
What James and Richard have to put up with ! :lol:
Author:  Bacchus [ Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: N (very) WR
P.S...if he'd wanted to shoot the bankers, I'm sure that would have been perfectly OK
Author:  Duncan [ Thu Dec 01, 2011 6:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: N (very) WR
that's not gone well
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/