GK wrote:
There's few better examples of its type for £6 on the high street but its not the best. That's where we come in.
Very nicely put GK.JG, Ms Macquerky and others in the daily newspapers:
For me, amongst the high profile wine professionals, Jancis's opinion closely matches my taste for many interesting wines that we may afford. I particularly believe in her claret opinion. For Burgundy, where I push the boat out, I'd follow Allen Meadows first, and Mel
, I like her burgundy and Rioja opinion a lot.
Oyster Bay:
A good intro to *SB, Oyster Bay was good in 2001, and again 2004, where it was always an easy choice on many tables. But later vintages '05 & '06 were dissapointing, I thought. So when I looked in here for more interesting *SB wines, I discovered an array of much more satisfying versions of the style.
Perhaps OB is back on some sort of form, I did not bother with their '07 offering, because you could find superior, The Reach '07 for less money and later JE'07 for similar money - so why OB, just because they have a bigger marketing budget. I don't suppose OB made a good fist of difficult '08 fruit....so why bother again.
Is OB back on form for 2009 ?
Mel says ok - BUT spritzy middle (very young wine) and flabby finish.
Goose says - Lame, no guts.
Is there a reason to buy because JG says so ?? I come here cos I want more that just OK. Also, and deliberately, I will seek out smaller producers. I'm looking for the taste of the wine, I'm not convinced by the size of the glossy adverts.
Bl**dy typical view point from me
As Shez - What do you say Ba ? Can you buy a cheap single to try.
.